CRIME AND SIN

                       CRIME  AND  SIN

     Crime and sin are two big words in any believer's life and most of my life, I have given equal importance to both. But they are equal only when you live in a country following the unaltered version of B. R. Ambedkar's constitution.

     In the eyes of law, marital rape may or may not be a crime. In the eyes of God, it is a sin; of highest degree. Not letting lovers unite and even killing them is considered honourable by humans. Gods? Rukmini eloped with Krishna ON HER WEDDING DAY.

     If you call out the wrongs of a powerful person, let alone a politician, you are an anti-national. But Parmatma will actually call you His 'brave and woken child'. In humans' eyes, killing a rapist Brahmin is "Brahmin Hatya"(Check Vinay Sharma). But Ram even killed the non-rapist Brahmin, Raavan.

     In the changing times of today, speaking in English is like a crime for an India. In God's eyes, one Brahmin, Eknath, was equal to a thousand Brahmins even though he loved all languages.

     In the forthcoming laws, being a Muslim will be a crime(Pratyaksh ko Pramaan Kaisa), but in our Radha Ma's eyes, Gulabsakhi was worthy of being in Her Family. Soon, these laws might make women secondary beings. But religion? Well, religion gives us Maa Kali. In today's laws, only the Central Eurasians, Aaryans, are Indians. In our Maker's eyes, "Vasudhev Kutumb Bakam".

     Soon, by law, these words of mine might be called a national threat, but for the Gods? "Ram Jaane!"

     

Crime or Not?

The problem with modern society is that they teach kids that killing is a crime. IT IS NOT. Killing for the wrong purpose is.

If you kill someone attacking you or someone else, it is a noble act. But kids are not taught so. So, they grow up being cowards.

All the great civilizations were built on being able to kill better than your rival. In other words, it is survival instinct. You can't call yourself a 'pacifist' if someone is constantly creating havoc. You can't just continue sitting peacefully. If you can, you have to get your hands dirty to maintain the peace.

You are not a supporter of non-violence, if you are being non-violent to someone being persistently violent.

Our idea of right and wrong has become very crooked in this era of "modernization". Our invaders are constantly attacking us in the name of 'justice' and we are hoping for God to come and save us.

The idea of 'non-violence' is good but not when our homes are under seize. At such times, we must fight. When people are defaming us with their lies, we must hit back with our truths. 

Well, as Karl Popper said, "We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant."

SLD